Author of this blog is an Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India & Also a Patent Agent with Indian Patent Office
For nearly 800 years, Nalanda survived only as ruins, memory, and legend. Once the intellectual heartbeat of Asia, the ancient university drew scholars from across the world long before modern global institutions existed. That silence has finally broken. From its destruction in the 12th century to its revival as a modern international campus in Rajgir, the story of Nalanda is not merely about rebuilding a university, it is about restoring a lost civilisational legacy.
Doctrinal and procedural limits of criminalising speech, constitutional protection. Substantive thresholds and procedural safeguards under the BNSS, Supreme Court in Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat.
The judgment in UPL vs Haryana Pesticides (2026), decided on 5 February 2026 by the Calcutta High Court’s Intellectual Property … More
Does the Constitution guarantee minimum wages to domestic workers? The Supreme Court answered this in 2026. In Thozhilalargal Sangam & Ors. v. … More
Cruelty in marriage does not retire with age. When an elderly husband subjects his wife to isolation, neglect, or economic and emotional abuse, it remains cruelty in the eyes of law. Old age cannot be used as a moral shield to normalise suffering, a wife’s right to dignity, safety, and respect continues for life.
Can insolvency tribunals decide trademark ownership disputes? In the Gloster trademark case, the Supreme Court clarified the limits of NCLT’s powers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and held that trademark ownership must be decided by civil or statutory forums, not within insolvency proceedings.
A creator must know these concepts to protect their rights. So I’m going to breakdown the concept of what is … More
An in-depth exploration of moral rights, performers’ rights, and copyright in Indian music, explained through the A.R. Rahman v. Dagar case. Learn how Indian law balances authorship, performance, and tradition in creative ownership.
As online matchmaking becomes the new normal, the shaadi[dot]com case serves as a crucial reminder of the legal risks of matrimonial websites in India. While matrimonial platforms promise verified profiles and safe connections, recent court rulings highlight how these sites are protected under Section 79 of the IT Act and the safe harbour clause, limiting their liability for user misconduct. This case exposes the growing tension between digital love and legal responsibility, raising important questions about user safety, data privacy, and accountability in India’s booming online matrimony industry.
The India–European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) officially came into force on 1 October 2025. … More
Vidhik-Vishleshan (Decoding The Law & More) 