Who owns an invention created by an employee? Is a separate assignment deed always necessary to establish patent ownership? Recent decisions of the Madras and Delhi High Courts have brought much-needed clarity to the law governing patent assignments and proof of right in India. These judgments emphasize that ownership is determined by the substance of the underlying legal relationship rather than mere technical formalities. This article examines the statutory framework under the Patents Act, 1970, the distinction between assignment of the right to apply and assignment of a granted patent, and the evolving judicial approach towards employment agreements, inventor declarations, and documentary evidence establishing patent ownership.
Category: Law
What Are Standard Essential Patents? How Modern Technology Depends on SEPs
Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) form the invisible legal and technological infrastructure behind modern connectivity. From smartphones and Wi-Fi routers to smart vehicles and streaming platforms, countless technologies function through common technical standards that ensure interoperability across devices and networks. When a patented invention becomes indispensable for implementing such a standard, it transforms into a Standard Essential Patent. Because manufacturers cannot comply with the standard without using the patented technology, SEPs occupy a unique position at the intersection of patent law, innovation policy, and competition regulation. This article explains the concept of SEPs, their role across different technological sectors, and the significance of FRAND licensing obligations in maintaining balance between innovation and market access
Free Speech, Criminal Thresholds, and Judicial Control
Doctrinal and procedural limits of criminalising speech, constitutional protection. Substantive thresholds and procedural safeguards under the BNSS, Supreme Court in Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat.
Calcutta High Court On Whether The Patent Office Can Merge Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition? And How This Impacts Future Pre Grant Oppositions
The judgment in UPL vs Haryana Pesticides (2026), decided on 5 February 2026 by the Calcutta High Court’s Intellectual Property … More
Supreme Court On Fixing Minimum Wages Of Domestic Workers
Does the Constitution guarantee minimum wages to domestic workers? The Supreme Court answered this in 2026. In Thozhilalargal Sangam & Ors. v. … More
A Case On – What Happens When An Elderly Woman Is Subjected To Cruelty By Her Husband
Cruelty in marriage does not retire with age. When an elderly husband subjects his wife to isolation, neglect, or economic and emotional abuse, it remains cruelty in the eyes of law. Old age cannot be used as a moral shield to normalise suffering, a wife’s right to dignity, safety, and respect continues for life.
Copyright Versus Moral Rights Versus Performers Right
A creator must know these concepts to protect their rights. So I’m going to breakdown the concept of what is … More
Moral Rights, Performers’ Rights and Copyright: Creative Ownership in Indian Music
An in-depth exploration of moral rights, performers’ rights, and copyright in Indian music, explained through the A.R. Rahman v. Dagar case. Learn how Indian law balances authorship, performance, and tradition in creative ownership.
Beware of The Risks Matrimonial Websites Pose & The Law Which Protects Such Websites
As online matchmaking becomes the new normal, the shaadi[dot]com case serves as a crucial reminder of the legal risks of matrimonial websites in India. While matrimonial platforms promise verified profiles and safe connections, recent court rulings highlight how these sites are protected under Section 79 of the IT Act and the safe harbour clause, limiting their liability for user misconduct. This case exposes the growing tension between digital love and legal responsibility, raising important questions about user safety, data privacy, and accountability in India’s booming online matrimony industry.
Understanding Sahyog Portal Case (Timeline): X Corp (Twitter) vs Union of India
Explore the timeline of the X Corp vs Indian Government case over the Sahyog portal and social media regulation in India. Learn how the IT Act 2000, Shreya Singhal judgment, and Karnataka High Court ruling has shaped online freedom of speech and content takedown orders.